If by domestic disclipline you mean a relationship where one party (usually the husband I assume) has the authority over the other and has the ability to discipline (via spanking, etc) and/or back up that authority, by any means necessary, then I take issue with it.
Let me say this: to each his own. How you chose to live your life and marriage is up to you. Hakuna matata. However you asked what I think about it. Frankly, I think its the most asinine non-sense I've heard in a long while. I can't imagine asking my wife to allow me to reign supreme over here in such a way that I'd basically be her father. I just couldn't do it. Maybe I like my mother too much and don't have designs on kicking rabbits and therefore dont buy this practice, but it wouldn't work for me. I want a partner in a wife - a sidekick - somebody I can do dastardly deeds with and then pretend we didn't later. I don't want somebody to lord over and impose my will upon. I ALSO wouldn't cotton too well to a woman who was so subservient to me that she'd basically be my slave. Maybe thats a bit extreme, but its how it comes across to me.
But picture me putting my wife across my knee and spanking her for not having my laundry done. That would never work in my house. Mostly because I LOVE (!!!!) doing laundry. The only time I want to spank my wife is when we're pleasuring eachother with fly swatters and spatulas. You know, during Thanksgiving and such.
So if this is something you are okay with and don't mind being apart of, by all means, do your thing, but there's no way I could suggest or subject any woman I loved to that non-sense.
It was written.